Exploration of Perception of Parenting Styles among Tribal Children

Auteurs-es

  • Mohd Muzamil Author
  • Shawkat Ahmad Shah Author

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18213846

Mots-clés :

Authoritative, Authoritarian, Permissive, Neglectful, Parenting Style

Résumé

The study was carried out on a sample of 120 tribal children selected purposively from Gujjar & Bakarwal Hostels & Schools functional in Srinagar, J&K. The primary objectives of the study were to assess perception of parenting styles among tribal children, to compare perceptions of parenting styles by tribal children with respect to various demographic variables and to check correlation between various facets of parenting styles. For assessment of the parenting styles, the tool developed by Muzamil and Shawkat (2023) was adopted. The main findings of the study are authoritative parenting style has significant positive correlation with permissive parenting style (r= 0.286, P= 0.01); Authoritarian parenting style has significant positive correlation with neglectful parenting style (r= 0.313, P= 0.01) and Permissive Parenting Style has significant positive correlation with neglectful parenting style. Further, male tribal children report their parenting styles to be more permissive and neglectful as compared to female tribal children and the children whose fathers are farmers perceive their parenting styles to be more authoritative than the children whose parents are either labourers, drivers or government employees.

Téléchargements

Les données de téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponible.

Biographies de l'auteur-e

  • Mohd Muzamil

    Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, J&K, India

  • Shawkat Ahmad Shah

    Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, J&K, India

Publié

2026-06-01

Déclaration sur la disponibilité des données

Available on Request

Comment citer

Exploration of Perception of Parenting Styles among Tribal Children. (2026). Current Research in Behavioral & Social Sciences, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18213846